Comparison Overview
McDonald's Indonesia
McDonald's Indonesia
Jl. Bulevar Artha Gading Kav. A1 , Jakarta Utara, 14240, ID
Last Update: 30/09/2026
McDonald’s merupakan restoran fast food terbesar di dunia yang diawali pada tahun 1955 di California, Amerika Serikat. Dengan produk unggulan berupa Burger bernama Bigmac, McDonald’s hingga saat ini telah memiliki ribuan restoran yang tersebar di lebih dari 100 negara, ...
Red Robin
6312 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 200 North, Greenwood Village, CO, US, 80111
Last Update: 17/09/2026
Since opening in 1969 in Seattle, Washington, Red Robin has welcomed Guests to our casual dining restaurants in the U.S. and Canada, connecting people around craveable food and fun in a relaxed, playful atmosphere. Our people are the foundation of our success. We aim t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
McDonald's Indonesia
Red Robin
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
McDonald's Indonesia has 51.69% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Red Robin in 2026.
Incident History - McDonald's Indonesia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
McDonald's Indonesia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Red Robin (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Red Robin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
McDonald's Indonesia
Red Robin
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.