Comparison Overview
MCC Label

MCC Label
6111 N River Rd, None, Rosemont, Illinois, US, 60018
Last Update: 04/04/2026
As the global leader of premium labels, MCC helps brands stand out in competitive markets and inspire positive consumer experiences. With a network of 12,000+ teammates and facilities across 25+ countries and six continents, we combine global reach with the personalized...

Sealed Air Corporation
2415 Cascade Pointe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC, US, 28208
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Sealed Air is in business to protect, to solve critical packaging challenges, and to make our world better than we find it. Our automated packaging solutions promote a safer, more resilient, and less wasteful global food, fluids and liquids supply chain, enable e-commer...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

MCC Label







Sealed Air Corporation






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MCC Label in 2026.
Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sealed Air Corporation in 2026.
Incident History - MCC Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MCC Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sealed Air Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sealed Air Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

MCC Label

Sealed Air Corporation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.