Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
McAfee

McAfee Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

mcafee.com

We’re creating what’s next in online protection. As technologists, creatives, and people who thrive on looking forward, we make life online safe, so everyone can enjoy it with confidence—in all the ever-shifting forms it will take. Just as life online is full of possibility, life at McAfee is as well. You’ll have the freedom to explore challenges, take smart risks, and reach your potential in one of the fastest-growing industries in the world—backed by a team that supports and inspires you. ​


McAfee A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

McAfee
Company Information
Website:https://www.mcafee.com/
Employees number:5,598
Number of followers:335,123
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:mcafee.com
McAfee Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
McAfeeComputer and Network Security
Updated:
03/07/2026
742/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
McAfee Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
McAfeeComputer and Network Security
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

McAfee
McAfeeModerate
Current Score
742Ba (MODERATE)
01000
3 incidents
-16.5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
744Before Incident
JULY 2026
742Before Incident
JUNE 2026
761Before Incident
Cyber Attack
26 Jun 2026McAfee
PayPal, Shopify, McAfee, Norton and Apple: Scammers Abuse Shopify to Send Fake Invoices and Steal Credentials via Fake Support Calls

Scammers Exploit Shopify’s Shop App to Deliver Fake Invoices in Phishing Scheme

742After Incident
HIGH-19
NORPAYSHOAPPMCA1782469522
Scammers Exploit Shopify’s Shop App to Deliver Fake Invoices in Phishing Scheme Security researchers Luis Corrons and Jakub Vavra from Gen have uncovered a rising trend of scammers abusing Shopify’s Shop order-tracking app to distribute fraudulent invoices directly within users’ purchase histories. Unlike traditional email phishing, this tactic leverages in-app social engineering, exploiting trust in a platform typically used for legitimate order tracking. The scam involves fake receipts appearing in the Shop app, impersonating well-known brands such as Norton, McAfee, Apple, and PayPal. These fraudulent entries often labeled under generic seller names like “My Store” feature high-value items like antivirus subscriptions, smartphones, or gift cards to create urgency. Attackers embed fake support phone numbers in unusual fields, such as product descriptions or shipping addresses, where legitimate receipts would never include them. When victims call the listed number, the attack escalates into voice phishing (vishing), with scammers posing as customer support to extract sensitive data including login credentials, payment details, or one-time passcodes. Some victims are also tricked into installing remote access software, granting attackers control over their devices. The Shop app aggregates order data from sources like Gmail, Outlook, and Shop Pay, automatically scanning connected email accounts for shipping-related keywords. While the exact method of injecting fake orders remains unclear, potential vectors include email parsing manipulation, merchant workflow abuse, or loosely validated input fields. Importantly, there is no evidence of a breach in Shopify, the Shop app, or the impersonated brands this is an abuse of legitimate platform features rather than a direct compromise. This campaign reflects a broader shift in phishing tactics, where attackers exploit contextual trust in familiar digital environments. Similar schemes have been observed in calendar invite scams and collaboration platform abuse, where the delivery channel itself lends credibility to the scam. The emergence of in-app invoice fraud highlights the growing challenge for cybersecurity defenses, as malicious content becomes harder to detect when embedded within trusted ecosystems.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Phishing / Social Engineering
MOTIVATION
Financial gain, data theft
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Login credentials, payment details, one-time passcodes, personally identifiable informationSystems Affected: User devices (via remote access software installation)Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage to Shopify and impersonated brands (Norton, McAfee, Apple, PayPal)Identity Theft Risk: HighPayment Information Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Login credentials, payment details, one-time passcodes, personally identifiable informationSensitivity Of Data: High (financial and personal data)Data Exfiltration: Yes (via vishing attacks)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
MAY 2026
760Before Incident
APRIL 2026
759Before Incident
MARCH 2026
773Before Incident
Cyber Attack
11 Mar 2026McAfee
Sophos, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, Proton Drive, SentinelOne, Bitdefender, ESET and McAfee: New Avalon Malware Framework Packs CrownX Ransomware Capabilities

New Modular Malware Framework 'Avalon' Unveiled in Sophisticated Phishing Attack

759After Incident
CRITICAL-14
CROMICBITSOPSENPROESEMCA1783117511
New Modular Malware Framework "Avalon" Unveiled in Sophisticated Phishing Attack Cybersecurity researchers have identified a previously unknown modular malware framework, Avalon, distributed via a multi-stage phishing campaign designed to evade traditional security controls. The framework integrates credential theft, lateral movement, remote access, recovery disruption, and ransomware execution with its ransomware component internally dubbed CrownX. The attack begins with a spoofed legal document email directing recipients to a password-protected archive hosted on Proton Drive. Instead of attaching malicious files directly, attackers embedded them within an ISO image, reducing detection at the email layer. When a victim interacts with a document-themed Windows shortcut (Secure Document CA-283505.pdf.lnk) inside the mounted image, it triggers a sequence that deploys Avalon. The shortcut executes an MSBuild project within the ISO, which loads an embedded .NET assembly to disable Event Tracing for Windows (ETW), obscuring forensic visibility. The malware then downloads a next-stage payload over HTTPS to deploy Avalon, which includes an extensive defense evasion subsystem targeting security tools from Microsoft Defender, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, Sophos, Elastic Endpoint, FortiEDR, ESET, McAfee, and Bitdefender. Avalon’s capabilities include: - Credential harvesting from Chromium-based browsers, Firefox, cryptocurrency wallets (MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, Exodus, etc.), and apps like Discord, Slack, and Teams. - Data exfiltration to a remote server (helloxcherry[.]com) and command polling for further instructions. - Reconnaissance to prioritize high-value systems for lateral movement. - Ransomware execution using Windows Cryptography API, encrypting files tied to business operations, software development, and virtual infrastructure. - Recovery disruption by terminating the Volume Shadow Copy Service and deleting shadow copies. - Anti-forensic measures, including direct disk manipulation to corrupt partition data or boot records. Researchers note that CrownX represents only the final extortion stage by the time the ransom note appears, the framework has already stolen credentials, established C2 communications, and weakened recovery options. The malware also exhibits signs of AI-assisted development, suggesting lower barriers to entry for threat actors with limited technical expertise. ### AI-Driven Ransomware and Codeless Attacks Emerge In related developments, Sysdig reported the first publicly documented agentic ransomware attack powered by a large language model (LLM). The threat actor, JADEPUFFER, exploited CVE-2025-3248 to gain access to an exposed Langflow instance, executing an automated campaign that adapted in real-time to pivot toward a production database server for extortion. Separately, Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 uncovered an AI-powered malware combining a Telegram bot with a public LLM API (api.groq[.]com) to enable codeless attacks. The malware forwards system details to the attacker’s Telegram bot, then polls the API every five seconds to translate natural language instructions into shell commands eliminating the need for command-line expertise. The sample, uploaded to VirusTotal in March 2026, remains undetected by all engines.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MalwareRansomwarePhishing
MOTIVATION
Financial GainData ExfiltrationExtortion
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Credentials, cryptocurrency wallet data, business documents, software development files, virtual infrastructure filesSystems Affected: Windows systems with Chromium-based browsers, Firefox, cryptocurrency wallets, Discord, Slack, Teams, and security tools from Microsoft Defender, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, Sophos, Elastic Endpoint, FortiEDR, ESET, McAfee, and BitdefenderOperational Impact: Recovery disruption, encryption of critical files, termination of Volume Shadow Copy ServiceIdentity Theft Risk: High (credential harvesting, PII exposure)
DATA BREACH
CredentialsCryptocurrency wallet dataBusiness documentsSoftware development filesVirtual infrastructure filesSensitivity Of Data: High (PII, financial data, operational files)Data Exfiltration: Yes (to helloxcherry[.]com)Data Encryption: Yes (Windows Cryptography API for ransomware)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (credentials, wallet data)
FEBRUARY 2026
773Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
773Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
773Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
773Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
773Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
773Before Incident
APRIL 2017
774Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Apr 2017McAfee
McAfee

McAfee LinkedIn Profile Cyber Attack

760After Incident
HIGH-14
MCA22714822
McAfee was targeted by a cyber attack in April 2017. The actual target of the hack on the McAfee website was the company's LinkedIn profile, which has over 135,000 followers. One of the administrators of McAfee's LinkedIn page did two things that were very wrong: 1. The practice of using the same password for several online accounts. 2. Refusing to enable two-factor authentication.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyber Attack
IMPACT
Systems Affected: McAfee's LinkedIn Profile

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for McAfee ?
?
What was McAfee's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was McAfee's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was McAfee's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was McAfee's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was McAfee's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was McAfee's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was McAfee's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was McAfee's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was McAfee's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was McAfee's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was McAfee's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on McAfee's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with McAfee ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view McAfee's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?