Comparison Overview
MBRF

MBRF
Av das Nações Unidas, N° 14.401 , São Paulo, 04730-090, BR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We are one of the leading global producers and exporters of quality food, as we believe it is fundamental to a better life for all people. Not only what we do, but the way we do it, is guided by the purpose of a better life for everyone, from farm to fork. That is why...

PepsiCo
700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, 10577, US
Last Update: 06/07/2026
PepsiCo is a playground for curious people. We invite thinkers, doers, and changemakers to champion innovation, take calculated risks, and challenge the status quo. From executives to team members on the front lines, we’re excited about the future. We take chances. Toge...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

MBRF







PepsiCo






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MBRF in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
PepsiCo has 90.48% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - MBRF (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MBRF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PepsiCo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PepsiCo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

MBRF

PepsiCo
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.