Comparison Overview
Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America, Inc.

Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America, Inc.
2708 Orchard Pkwy, San Jose, 95134, US
Last Update: 26/02/2026
Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America (MBRDNA) is continuously striving to innovate premium mobility. It is a place for exceptional people with outstanding ideas and the absolute willingness to bring them to life. We are not about cars only - we are also ab...

Tesla
13101 Harold Green Rd, Austin, 78725, US
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Tesla is accelerating the world’s transition to sustainable abundance. To achieve our mission, we're building a world powered by solar, enabled by battery storage and transported by electric vehicles. We’re committed to hiring and developing top talent from around the...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America, Inc.







Tesla






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Tesla has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tesla (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tesla cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America, Inc.

Tesla
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.
The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.
An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.
A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.