Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MBA ESGMBA ESG
VS
University of Nebraska SystemUniversity of Nebraska System
MBA ESG

MBA ESG

35 avenue Philippe Auguste, Paris, FR, 75011

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
772/1000Fair

MBA ESG, entité du Groupe ESG est une école recrutant à partir de bac+3 avec un cycle en deux ans. Elle recrute également à bac+4 avec plus de 25 MBA spécialisés possibles. Sa mission : former les managers de demain. Les MBA ESG offrent également la possibilité d’effe...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:287
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Nebraska System

University of Nebraska System

3835 Holdrege St, Lincoln, 68583, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nebraska.edu
786/1000Fair

This is the official LinkedIn page of the the University of Nebraska System, the state of Nebraska's only public university. The NU System is comprised of four campuses: the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, the University of Nebraska at Omaha, the University of Nebraska ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:13,170
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MBA ESG

MBA ESG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Nebraska System

University of Nebraska System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MBA ESG in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Nebraska System in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MBA ESG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MBA ESG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Nebraska System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Nebraska System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MBA ESG

MBA ESG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Nebraska System

University of Nebraska System

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MBA ESG company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MBA ESG company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MBA ESG company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MBA ESG company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MBA ESG company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MBA ESG company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MBA ESG company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MBA ESG company and University of Nebraska System company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MBA ESG company and University of Nebraska System company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MBA ESG company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MBA ESG company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MBA ESG and University of Nebraska System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MBA ESG and University of Nebraska System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MBA ESG or University of Nebraska System ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MBA ESG or University of Nebraska System ?
Between MBA ESG and University of Nebraska System, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MBA ESG and University of Nebraska System, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1