Comparison Overview
MatiPay

MatiPay
Via San Sabino, 21, Mola di Bari, 70042, IT
Last Update: 06/03/2026
MatiPay is the fintech company belonging to Angel Company. In 2019 MatiPay received the CES Innovation Award 2019 at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas in the payment platforms category. In the same year Intesa Sanpaolo believed in the project and decided to sup...

Serco
16 Bartley Wood Business Park, Bartley Way, Hook, RG27 9UY, GB
Last Update: 03/04/2026
We bring together the right people, the right technology and the right partners to create innovative solutions that make positive impact and address some of the most urgent and complex challenges facing the modern world. With a focus on serving governments globally, ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

MatiPay







Serco






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MatiPay in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Serco in 2026.
Incident History - MatiPay (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MatiPay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Serco (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Serco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

MatiPay

Serco
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.