Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and InfluenceMIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence
VS
Yale UniversityYale University
MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence

MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence

Cambridge, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
787/1000Fair

In today’s dynamic business environment, effective negotiation is crucial for building strong relationships and achieving success. The Negotiation for Executives program from MIT Executive Education equips you with the tools and strategies to excel in high-stakes negoti...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:179
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Yale University

Yale University

Woodbridge Hall, New Haven, CT, US, 6520

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://news.yale.edu/
777/1000Fair

For more than 300 years, Yale University has inspired the minds that inspire the world. Based in New Haven, Connecticut, Yale brings people and ideas together for positive impact around the globe. A research university that focuses on students and encourages learning as...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:19,333
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence

MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Yale University

Yale University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Yale University has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Yale University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yale University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence

MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Yale University

Yale University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
THEYALRUTHARSTAINSPRI1778258906

FAQ

Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence company and Yale University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence company and Yale University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence company and Yale University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence company and Yale University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence company and Yale University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence company and Yale University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence company and Yale University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence company and Yale University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence company and Yale University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence company and Yale University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence company and Yale University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence and Yale University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence and Yale University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence or Yale University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence or Yale University ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence and Yale University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Negotiation and Influence and Yale University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8