Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MIT Sloan | Mastering Design ThinkingMIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking
VS
University of Nebraska SystemUniversity of Nebraska System
MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking

MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking

Cambridge, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://emrt.us/MS-MDT-LI-AU
787/1000Fair

In today’s competitive landscape, creative problem-solving is essential for addressing complex challenges. The Mastering Design Thinking program from MIT Sloan Executive Education is strategically designed to equip you with the skills to leverage the potential of design...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:175
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Nebraska System

University of Nebraska System

3835 Holdrege St, Lincoln, 68583, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nebraska.edu
786/1000Fair

This is the official LinkedIn page of the the University of Nebraska System, the state of Nebraska's only public university. The NU System is comprised of four campuses: the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, the University of Nebraska at Omaha, the University of Nebraska ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:13,170
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking

MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Nebraska System

University of Nebraska System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Nebraska System in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Nebraska System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Nebraska System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking

MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Nebraska System

University of Nebraska System

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and University of Nebraska System company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and University of Nebraska System company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and University of Nebraska System company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking and University of Nebraska System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking and University of Nebraska System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking or University of Nebraska System ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking or University of Nebraska System ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking and University of Nebraska System, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking and University of Nebraska System, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2