Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MIT Sloan | Mastering Design ThinkingMIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking
VS
Universiti Teknologi MARAUniversiti Teknologi MARA
MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking

MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking

Cambridge, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://emrt.us/MS-MDT-LI-AU
787/1000Fair

In today’s competitive landscape, creative problem-solving is essential for addressing complex challenges. The Mastering Design Thinking program from MIT Sloan Executive Education is strategically designed to equip you with the skills to leverage the potential of design...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:175
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Universiti Teknologi MARA

Universiti Teknologi MARA

Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, selangor, MY, 40450

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.uitm.edu.my
803/1000Good

Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) is the largest comprehensive university in Malaysia providing innovative education with state-of-the-art infrastructure and technology within reach at its 34 campuses (1 main campus, 12 state campuses and 21 satellite campuses), 4 Colleg...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:14,048
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking

MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Universiti Teknologi MARA

Universiti Teknologi MARA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universiti Teknologi MARA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Universiti Teknologi MARA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universiti Teknologi MARA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking

MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Universiti Teknologi MARA

Universiti Teknologi MARA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
UNI2141123

FAQ

Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking and Universiti Teknologi MARA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking and Universiti Teknologi MARA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking or Universiti Teknologi MARA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking or Universiti Teknologi MARA ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking and Universiti Teknologi MARA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MIT Sloan | Mastering Design Thinking and Universiti Teknologi MARA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2