Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MasterCorp, Inc.MasterCorp, Inc.
VS
Shangri-La GroupShangri-La Group
MasterCorp, Inc.

MasterCorp, Inc.

4700 MILLENIA BLVD, ORLANDO, 32839-6018, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.mastercorp.com
733/1000Moderate

With over 45 years of experience, MasterCorp has proudly served as a trusted partner in the hospitality services industry. At the heart of our success is our People Proud culture, where Associates are at the center of every decision we make and the driving force behind ...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:2,412
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Shangri-La Group

Shangri-La Group

Kerry Centre, 683 King's Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong, HK

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
726/1000Moderate

Headquartered in Hong Kong SAR, the Shangri-La Group has grown from a single hotel business to a diverse and integrated global portfolio comprising quality real estate and investment properties, wellness and lifestyle facilities. Today, the Group owns, operates and mana...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:16,362
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MasterCorp, Inc.

MasterCorp, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Shangri-La Group

Shangri-La Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MasterCorp, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shangri-La Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MasterCorp, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MasterCorp, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Shangri-La Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shangri-La Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MasterCorp, Inc.

MasterCorp, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAS709072525
Shangri-La Group

Shangri-La Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SHA2110161122

FAQ

Between MasterCorp, Inc. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. and Shangri-La Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. and Shangri-La Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MasterCorp, Inc. or Shangri-La Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MasterCorp, Inc. or Shangri-La Group ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. and Shangri-La Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MasterCorp, Inc. and Shangri-La Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2