Comparison Overview
Mastercard Global Partnerships

Mastercard Global Partnerships
2000 Purchase St, Purchase, 10577, US
Last Update: 09/03/2026
Whether you’re looking to drive growth with new revenue streams, reduce costs by driving operational efficiencies or diversify your business, Mastercard can help. We collaborate with like-minded partners, in and beyond payments, by applying Mastercard’s expertise, insi...

Sicredi
Av. Assis Brasil, Porto Alegre, 91010-003, BR
Last Update: 17/09/2026
We are born collaborative We believe that change is only possible when everyone works together for the same purpose, after all, cooperativism is in our DNA. Besides this, we know that as important as it is to provide affordable financial solutions it is just as importa...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Mastercard Global Partnerships







Sicredi






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mastercard Global Partnerships in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sicredi in 2026.
Incident History - Mastercard Global Partnerships (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mastercard Global Partnerships cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sicredi (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sicredi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Mastercard Global Partnerships

Sicredi
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.