Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSBMassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB
VS
Lars Larsen GroupLars Larsen Group
MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB

MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB

None, None, None, None, US, None

Last Update: 31/01/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. Since 1851, MassMutual has grown and thrived — surviving wars, depressions, recessions, and changing market conditions. Throughout, the company's main focus ha...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:46
Subsidiaries:61
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lars Larsen Group

Lars Larsen Group

Randersvej 2.c, 8600 Silkeborg, DK

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
771/1000Fair

Lars Larsen Group is owned by the Brunsborg family, descendants of JYSK founder Lars Larsen. The Group owns companies within a number of business areas including furniture, interior design, restaurants and hotels, and is also an active investor in equities, funds, and r...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:16,177
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB

MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lars Larsen Group

Lars Larsen Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lars Larsen Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lars Larsen Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lars Larsen Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB

MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lars Larsen Group

Lars Larsen Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB company and Lars Larsen Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB company and Lars Larsen Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB company and Lars Larsen Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB company and Lars Larsen Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB company and Lars Larsen Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB company and Lars Larsen Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB company and Lars Larsen Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB company and Lars Larsen Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB company and Lars Larsen Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB company and Lars Larsen Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB company and Lars Larsen Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB and Lars Larsen Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB and Lars Larsen Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB or Lars Larsen Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB or Lars Larsen Group ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB and Lars Larsen Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB and Lars Larsen Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8