Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MassMutual Central U.S.MassMutual Central U.S.
VS
Goldman SachsGoldman Sachs
MassMutual Central U.S.

MassMutual Central U.S.

100 S. Fifth St. , Minneapolis, MN, 55402, US

Last Update: 16/12/2025

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Preparing for that next step in life isn’t always easy. My combination of experience, professionalism and access to a wide variety of products and services can help you meet your financial goals, estate strategies and insurance needs. Whether your goals include preparin...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:42
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Goldman Sachs

Goldman Sachs

200 West Street, New York, 10282, US

Last Update: 12/10/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.goldmansachs.com
728/1000Moderate

We aspire to be the world’s most exceptional financial institution, united by our shared values of partnership, client service, integrity, and excellence. Operating at the center of capital markets, we act as one firm, mobilizing our people, capital, and ideas to deli...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:67,001
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MassMutual Central U.S.

MassMutual Central U.S.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Goldman Sachs

Goldman Sachs

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MassMutual Central U.S. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Goldman Sachs has 292.16% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - MassMutual Central U.S. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MassMutual Central U.S. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Goldman Sachs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goldman Sachs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MassMutual Central U.S.

MassMutual Central U.S.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Goldman Sachs

Goldman Sachs

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GITGOLNVI1791815573
🔒 Incident : Breach
JONGENMCDGOL1775507547
🔒 Incident : Breach
ERN1785357267

FAQ

Between MassMutual Central U.S. company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. company and Goldman Sachs company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. company and Goldman Sachs company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. and Goldman Sachs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. and Goldman Sachs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MassMutual Central U.S. or Goldman Sachs ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MassMutual Central U.S. or Goldman Sachs ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. and Goldman Sachs, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MassMutual Central U.S. and Goldman Sachs, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3