Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Massachusetts Clean Energy CenterMassachusetts Clean Energy Center
VS
Government of AlbertaGovernment of Alberta
Massachusetts Clean Energy Center

Massachusetts Clean Energy Center

294 Washington St, Boston, 02108, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.masscec.com
697/1000Weak

The Massachusetts Clean Energy Center is a state economic development agency dedicated to accelerating the growth of the clean energy and climatetech sector across the Commonwealth to spur job creation, deliver statewide environmental benefits, increase affordability, a...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:152
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Government of Alberta

Government of Alberta

Public Service Commission, Edmonton, T5J 2N2, CA

Last Update: 30/06/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.alberta.ca
638/1000Poor

Work with the Alberta government to build a stronger province for current and future generations. We offer diverse and rewarding employment opportunities in an environment that encourages continuous learning and career growth. We are one of the largest employers in...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:20,370
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Massachusetts Clean Energy Center

Massachusetts Clean Energy Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Government of Alberta

Government of Alberta

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massachusetts Clean Energy Center in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Government of Alberta has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Massachusetts Clean Energy Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massachusetts Clean Energy Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Government of Alberta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Government of Alberta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Massachusetts Clean Energy Center

Massachusetts Clean Energy Center

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MAS031072925
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAS2044171122
Government of Alberta

Government of Alberta

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GOVCEN1782851713
🔒 Incident : Breach
GOVELE1777661104

FAQ

Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center company and Government of Alberta company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center company and Government of Alberta company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center company and Government of Alberta company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center company and Government of Alberta company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center company and Government of Alberta company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center company and Government of Alberta company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center company and Government of Alberta company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center company and Government of Alberta company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center company and Government of Alberta company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center company and Government of Alberta company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center company and Government of Alberta company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center and Government of Alberta, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center and Government of Alberta, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Massachusetts Clean Energy Center or Government of Alberta ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Massachusetts Clean Energy Center or Government of Alberta ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center and Government of Alberta, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Massachusetts Clean Energy Center and Government of Alberta, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-80138
SUMMARY

ClipBucket V5's web installer fails to properly validate or escape the php_cli_filepath parameter before passing it to shell execution. Unauthenticated attackers can submit a crafted POST request to the installer with a malicious php_cli_filepath value to execute arbitrary commands as the web server user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79912
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The impacted element is the function getCurrentTime of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Performing a manipulation of the argument ntp_server results in command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79911
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The affected element is the function setSystemConfig of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Such manipulation of the argument Hostname leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-70665
SUMMARY

Doorkeeper OpenID Connect implements an OpenID Connect authentication provider for Rails applications on top of Doorkeeper. Prior to 1.10.4, the Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) endpoint persists client-supplied scopes without validating them against the server's configured scope set. Under certain conditions, this allows a self-registered client to obtain scopes beyond what the server intended to grant. In DynamicClientRegistrationController#application_params, the scopes attribute is assigned directly from params[:scope] with no validation against Doorkeeper.configuration.scopes or optional_scopes. Combined with enforce_configured_scopes being off by default and Doorkeeper's ScopeChecker prioritizing application-level scopes over server-level scopes, this creates a privilege escalation path. This issue is fixed in version 1.10.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-55805
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Drupal core versions: from 0.0.0 to 10.6.13, from 11.3.0 to 11.3.14, from 11.4.0 to 11.4.4, from 0.0.0 to 11.0.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.1.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.2.*.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA