Comparison Overview

Massachusetts General Hospital

VS

UnitedHealthcare

Massachusetts General Hospital

55 Fruit Street, Boston, 02114, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 700 and 749

Guided by the needs of our patients and their families, Massachusetts General Hospital aims to deliver the very best health care in a safe, compassionate environment; to advance that care through innovative research and education; and, to improve the health and well-being of the diverse communities we serve. Visit our careers page! http://www.mghcareers.org

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,712
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

UnitedHealthcare

9700 Healthcare Lane, Minnetonka, 55343, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 650 and 699

When it comes to your health, everything matters. That’s why UnitedHealthcare is helping people live healthier lives and making the health system work better for everyone. Our health plans are there for you in moments big and small, delivering a simple experience, affordable coverage, and supportive care. At UnitedHealthcare, part of the UnitedHealth Group family of businesses, we are working to create a system that is connected, aligned and more affordable for all involved; one that delivers high quality care, responsive to the needs of each person and the communities in which they live. With connections to more than 1.3 million physicians and care professionals and 6,500 hospitals and care facilities across the globe, we can collaborate in new ways to improve patient care while providing customizable and comprehensive solutions in any marketplace, anywhere. Our Values Integrity: Honor commitments. Never compromise ethics. Compassion: Walk in the shoes of the people we serve and those with whom we work. Relationships: Build trust through collaboration. Innovation: Invent the future. Learn from the past. Performance: Demonstrate excellence in everything we do. For more information about UnitedHealthcare, click here: https://www.uhc.com/ For information about careers at UnitedHealthcare, click here: https://www.workatuhc.com

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,035
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-general-hospital.jpeg
Massachusetts General Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unitedhealthcare.jpeg
UnitedHealthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Massachusetts General Hospital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UnitedHealthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massachusetts General Hospital in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UnitedHealthcare in 2026.

Incident History — Massachusetts General Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massachusetts General Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UnitedHealthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UnitedHealthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-general-hospital.jpeg
Massachusetts General Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unitedhealthcare.jpeg
UnitedHealthcare
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Physical Violence
Motivation: Protest against healthcare insurance claim denials, Criticism of healthcare companies' focus on profits over patient care
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Massachusetts General Hospital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UnitedHealthcare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UnitedHealthcare company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Massachusetts General Hospital company.

In the current year, UnitedHealthcare company and Massachusetts General Hospital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

UnitedHealthcare company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Massachusetts General Hospital company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both UnitedHealthcare company and Massachusetts General Hospital company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

UnitedHealthcare company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Massachusetts General Hospital company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital company nor UnitedHealthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor UnitedHealthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Massachusetts General Hospital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UnitedHealthcare company.

Massachusetts General Hospital company employs more people globally than UnitedHealthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor UnitedHealthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor UnitedHealthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor UnitedHealthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor UnitedHealthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor UnitedHealthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor UnitedHealthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H