Comparison Overview

Massachusetts General Hospital

VS

Texas Health Resources

Massachusetts General Hospital

55 Fruit Street, Boston, 02114, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 700 and 749

Guided by the needs of our patients and their families, Massachusetts General Hospital aims to deliver the very best health care in a safe, compassionate environment; to advance that care through innovative research and education; and, to improve the health and well-being of the diverse communities we serve. Visit our careers page! http://www.mghcareers.org

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,712
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Texas Health Resources

612 E Lamar Blvd, Arlington, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

At Texas Health Resources, our mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities we serve. We are one of the largest faith-based, nonprofit health systems in the United States with a team of more than 28,000 employees of wholly owned/operated facilities and consolidated joint ventures in the greater Dallas Fort Worth area. Our career growth and professional development opportunities are top-notch and our benefits are equally outstanding. Join our award-winning Texas Health family and become a part of a team that is improving the health of our communities daily. You belong here. Let us brag for a minute on just a few of our recent accomplishments. • Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For® 2025 • Business Group on Health Best Employers: Excellence in Health & Well-being Award 2025 • 20 Best Workplaces in Health Care by Great Place to Work® and Fortune 2025 • Companies That Care® by PEOPLE magazine and Great Place to Work® 2025 • America’s Best Large Employers by Forbes for 2025 • Fortune’s Best Workplaces for Women™ 2025 We are an Equal Opportunity Employer and do not discriminate against any employees or applicant for employment because of race, color, sex, age, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, status as a veteran, and basis of disability or any other federal, state or local protected class.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,844
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-general-hospital.jpeg
Massachusetts General Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-health-resources.jpeg
Texas Health Resources
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Massachusetts General Hospital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Texas Health Resources
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massachusetts General Hospital in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Health Resources in 2026.

Incident History — Massachusetts General Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massachusetts General Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Texas Health Resources (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Health Resources cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-general-hospital.jpeg
Massachusetts General Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-health-resources.jpeg
Texas Health Resources
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Texas Health Resources company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Massachusetts General Hospital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Massachusetts General Hospital company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Texas Health Resources company.

In the current year, Texas Health Resources company and Massachusetts General Hospital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Texas Health Resources company nor Massachusetts General Hospital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Texas Health Resources company and Massachusetts General Hospital company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Texas Health Resources company nor Massachusetts General Hospital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital company nor Texas Health Resources company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor Texas Health Resources holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Massachusetts General Hospital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Texas Health Resources company.

Massachusetts General Hospital company employs more people globally than Texas Health Resources company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor Texas Health Resources holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor Texas Health Resources holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor Texas Health Resources holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor Texas Health Resources holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor Texas Health Resources holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital nor Texas Health Resources holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H