Comparison Overview

Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health

VS

Public Health Association of Australia

Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health

120 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts, 01970-6396, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.macgh.org

The Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health (MACGH) was founded to help individuals struggling with gambling. Today, we’ve grown into a private, non-profit public health agency offering a range of services for those impacted by gambling and gaming. Our work engages industry stakeholders, clinicians, policymakers, and community professionals from across the globe. And 40 years later, we still support individuals and their loved ones. Our commitment strives to balance public health priorities with a people-first model for gambling and gaming.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Public Health Association of Australia

None, None, Canberra, ACT, AU, 2600
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.phaa.net.au/

We’re Australia's peak body for public health and advocate for the health and wellbeing of everyone. We strive to help prevent, rather than cure, illness and disease. Our campaigns and activities span numerous public health issues from environmental health, immunisation and pandemic control, through to tobacco, gambling, physical activity, junk food marketing, preventive mental health, health education and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health. Our 2,000+ individual members represent over 40 professional groups interested in the promotion of public health. We have branches in every State and Territory. We also produce The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH); a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary, open access journal covering public health issues. Learn more at phaa.net.au

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-council-on-compulsive-gambling.jpeg
Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-health-association-of-australia.jpeg
Public Health Association of Australia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Public Health Association of Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Health Association of Australia in 2025.

Incident History — Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Public Health Association of Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public Health Association of Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-council-on-compulsive-gambling.jpeg
Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-health-association-of-australia.jpeg
Public Health Association of Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Public Health Association of Australia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Public Health Association of Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company.

In the current year, Public Health Association of Australia company and Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Public Health Association of Australia company nor Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Public Health Association of Australia company nor Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Public Health Association of Australia company nor Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company nor Public Health Association of Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health nor Public Health Association of Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company nor Public Health Association of Australia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Public Health Association of Australia company employs more people globally than Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health nor Public Health Association of Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health nor Public Health Association of Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health nor Public Health Association of Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health nor Public Health Association of Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health nor Public Health Association of Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health nor Public Health Association of Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References