Comparison Overview

MAS Holdings

VS

Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited

MAS Holdings

Level 10, Aitken Spence Tower 2 Vauxhall Street Colombo, Colombo, LK
Last Update: 2025-12-26
Between 750 and 799

MAS is an innovation driven company founded on a perfect blend of daring and visionary thinking. Focusing on fashion and lifestyle, we are one of Asia’s largest manufacturers of intimate apparel, sportswear, performance wear and swimwear and provide IT solutions to the apparel and footwear industry worldwide. MAS nurtures and drives a culture of excellence where over 114,000 global associates activate their full potential. Our identity, which goes beyond great products, is deeply embedded in community well-being and nurturing world-class teams.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited

D-1st Floor, Oberoi Gardens Estate Chandivali Farms Rd Mumbai, Maharashtra 400072, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

BRFL is a vertically integrated textile company, engaged in the manufacture of a wide range of fabrics and garments from state of the art production facilities. Apart from being the largest Shirt manufacturer in India, we have successfully evolved into a multi-fiber manufacturing company producing fabrics such as Cotton, Polyester, Tencel, Modal, Lycra, Wool and various blends. Our yarn dyed fabric, printing techniques, finishing, processing, weaving, stitching are a mark of excellence making every piece of fabric perfect. With fabric manufacturing facilities of 100 million meters per annum, garment manufacturing facilities of 60 million pieces per annum, being expanded to 90 million pieces per annum and a strong employee base of around 38,000; BRFL is today one of the most sought after brands in the Indian as well as International fashion markets.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mas-holdings.jpeg
MAS Holdings
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bombay-rayon-fashions-limited.jpeg
Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MAS Holdings
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Apparel & Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MAS Holdings in 2025.

Incidents vs Apparel & Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited in 2025.

Incident History — MAS Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MAS Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mas-holdings.jpeg
MAS Holdings
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bombay-rayon-fashions-limited.jpeg
Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MAS Holdings company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MAS Holdings company.

In the current year, Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited company and MAS Holdings company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited company nor MAS Holdings company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited company nor MAS Holdings company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited company nor MAS Holdings company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MAS Holdings company nor Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MAS Holdings nor Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MAS Holdings company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited company.

Both MAS Holdings company and Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither MAS Holdings nor Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MAS Holdings nor Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MAS Holdings nor Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MAS Holdings nor Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MAS Holdings nor Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MAS Holdings nor Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 2.0.0, in self-hosted n8n instances where the Code node runs in legacy (non-task-runner) JavaScript execution mode, authenticated users with workflow editing access can invoke internal helper functions from within the Code node. This allows a workflow editor to perform actions on the n8n host with the same privileges as the n8n process, including: reading files from the host filesystem (subject to any file-access restrictions configured on the instance and OS/container permissions), and writing files to the host filesystem (subject to the same restrictions). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve limiting file operations by setting N8N_RESTRICT_FILE_ACCESS_TO to a dedicated directory (e.g., ~/.n8n-files) and ensure it contains no sensitive data, keeping N8N_BLOCK_FILE_ACCESS_TO_N8N_FILES=true (default) to block access to .n8n and user-defined config files, and disabling high-risk nodes (including the Code node) using NODES_EXCLUDE if workflow editors are not fully trusted.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving LLMs. Prior to version 0.11.1, an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in lmdeploy where torch.load() is called without the weights_only=True parameter when loading model checkpoint files. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine when they load a malicious .bin or .pt model file. This issue has been patched in version 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 1.114.0, a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability may occur in n8n when using the “Respond to Webhook” node. When this node responds with HTML content containing executable scripts, the payload may execute directly in the top-level window, rather than within the expected sandbox introduced in version 1.103.0. This behavior can enable a malicious actor with workflow creation permissions to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the n8n editor interface. This issue has been patched in version 1.114.0. Workarounds for this issue involve restricting workflow creation and modification privileges to trusted users only, avoiding use of untrusted HTML responses in the “Respond to Webhook” node, and using an external reverse proxy or HTML sanitizer to filter responses that include executable scripts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Yealink T21P_E2 Phone 52.84.0.15 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal. A remote normal privileged attacker can read arbitrary files via a crafted request result read function of the diagnostic component.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N