Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Martin County School DistrictMartin County School District
VS
Charlotte-Mecklenburg SchoolsCharlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
Martin County School District

Martin County School District

1939 SE Federal Highway, Stuart, 34994, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.martinschools.org
759/1000Fair

The Martin County School District is located on Florida's pristine Treasure Coast. We proudly educate approximately 16,200 PK-12 students in our 12 elementary schools, 5 middle schools, 3 comprehensive high schools, 2 special centers, 4 preschool centers and 2 adult ed...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:1,488
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

600 East Fourth Street, Fifth Floor, Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28202

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cmsk12.org/
783/1000Fair

The mission of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools is to create an innovative, inclusive, student-centered environment that supports the development of independent learners. The vision of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools is to lead the community in educational excellence, inspi...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:15,606
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Martin County School District

Martin County School District

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Martin County School District in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Martin County School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Martin County School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Martin County School District

Martin County School District

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAR23119623
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHA133120422

FAQ

Between Martin County School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Martin County School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Martin County School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Martin County School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Martin County School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Martin County School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Martin County School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Martin County School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Martin County School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Martin County School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Martin County School District company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Martin County School District and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Martin County School District and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Martin County School District or Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Martin County School District or Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools ?
Between Martin County School District and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Martin County School District and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA