Comparison Overview
Marmon Industrial Water

Marmon Industrial Water
4475 Corporate Dr, Burlington, Ontario, L7L 5T9, CA
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Marmon Industrial Water (MIW) is among the world‘s most experienced water technology companies primarily focused on the Power Generation, Oil Refining and Chemical production markets while supplying to other markets such as Pulp and Paper, Sugar, Mining and other heavy ...

Neoenergia
Praia do Flamengo, 78, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Somos uma companhia de capital aberto com ações (NEOE3) negociadas na Bolsa de Valores de São Paulo. Parte do grupo espanhol Iberdrola, atuamos no Brasil desde 1997, e atualmente, somos uma das líderes do setor elétrico do país. Estamos presentes em 18 estados e no Dist...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Marmon Industrial Water







Neoenergia






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Marmon Industrial Water in 2026.
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Neoenergia in 2026.
Incident History - Marmon Industrial Water (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Marmon Industrial Water cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Neoenergia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Neoenergia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Marmon Industrial Water

Neoenergia
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.