Comparison Overview
Marks and Spencer
Marks and Spencer
Waterside House, London, W2 1NW, GB
Last Update: 06/09/2026
At M&S, we're dedicated to being the most trusted retailer, prioritising quality and delivering value. Every day, we bring the magic of M&S to our customers, whenever, wherever and however they want to shop with us. For over a century, we've set the standard, doing the ...
Fnac Darty
ZAC PORT D IVRY 9 RUE DES BATEAUX LAVOIRS, IVRY SUR SEINE, FR, 94200
Last Update: 03/09/2026
Le groupe Fnac Darty est un leader européen de la distribution omnicanale, spécialisé dans les biens culturels, les loisirs, les produits techniques, l’électroménager et les services. Avec un réseau de 1 500 magasins dans le monde et 30 000 collaborateurs passionnés, il...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Marks and Spencer
Fnac Darty
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
Marks and Spencer has 257.14% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
Fnac Darty has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Marks and Spencer (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Marks and Spencer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Fnac Darty (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fnac Darty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Marks and Spencer
Fnac Darty
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.