Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MARK CompressorsMARK Compressors
VS
BilfingerBilfinger
MARK Compressors

MARK Compressors

Keplerstraße 19, Reutlingen, Baden-Württemberg, 72762, DE

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
742/1000Moderate

Mark was established in Brendola, Italy in 1970 and 4 years later, it started to sell piston compressor to foreign countries. The export business was proved to be very successful and promoted the rapid development of the company. By 1988, over 10,000 screw compressors h...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bilfinger

Bilfinger

Oskar-Meixner-Straße 1, Mannheim, 68163, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bilfinger.com
760/1000Fair

Bilfinger is an international industrial services provider with a vision to be the No. 1 for its customers in enhancing efficiency and sustainability within the process industry. Bilfinger’s comprehensive portfolio spans the entire value chain, from consulting & enginee...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:10,985
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MARK Compressors

MARK Compressors

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bilfinger

Bilfinger

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MARK Compressors in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bilfinger in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MARK Compressors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MARK Compressors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bilfinger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bilfinger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MARK Compressors

MARK Compressors

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bilfinger

Bilfinger

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MARK Compressors company and Bilfinger company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MARK Compressors company and Bilfinger company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MARK Compressors company and Bilfinger company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MARK Compressors company and Bilfinger company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MARK Compressors company and Bilfinger company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MARK Compressors company and Bilfinger company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MARK Compressors company and Bilfinger company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MARK Compressors company and Bilfinger company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MARK Compressors company and Bilfinger company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MARK Compressors company and Bilfinger company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MARK Compressors company and Bilfinger company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MARK Compressors and Bilfinger, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MARK Compressors and Bilfinger, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MARK Compressors or Bilfinger ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MARK Compressors or Bilfinger ?
Between MARK Compressors and Bilfinger, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MARK Compressors and Bilfinger, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA