Comparison Overview
MARK Architectural Lighting

MARK Architectural Lighting
Atlanta, US
Last Update: 31/01/2026
Enhance your design vision with thoughtful lighting solutions from Mark Architectural Lighting™. With its clean form factors, minimalist product detailing and innovative design, Mark Architectural Lighting designs architectural lighting solutions to complement the archi...

Legrand
128 avenue du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, Limoges, 87045, FR
Last Update: 12/09/2026
Legrand is a global specialist in electrical and digital building infrastructures, dedicated to supporting technological, societal and environmental change around the globe. Our purpose is to improve lives by transforming the spaces where people live, work and meet by...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

MARK Architectural Lighting







Legrand






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MARK Architectural Lighting in 2026.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Legrand in 2026.
Incident History - MARK Architectural Lighting (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MARK Architectural Lighting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Legrand (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Legrand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

MARK Architectural Lighting

Legrand
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.