Comparison Overview

MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER

VS

Royal Collection Trust

MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER

520 BARRACUDA BLVD, New Smyrna, Florida 32169, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://marinediscoverycenter.org

The Marine Discovery Center's mission is to protect our coastal ecosystems through education, conservation, and exploration. We provide experiences and expertise in coastal ecology that engage our community, improve our well-being, and inspire conservation of our natural world. Our vision is for a healthy coastal ecosystem . . . for all, forever.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Royal Collection Trust

Buckingham Palace, London, GB, SW1A 1AA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rct.uk

Royal Collection Trust is one of the five departments of the Royal Household. We care for the Royal Collection, one of the world's greatest art collections, and manage the public opening of the official residences of His Majesty The King – Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and the Palace of Holyroodhouse in Edinburgh. Our work is undertaken without public funding of any kind. Income generated from admissions, our shops and other commercial initiatives funds the conservation of the Royal Collection and projects to increase access to and enjoyment of the Collection, such as exhibitions, publications and educational programmes. We employ over 500 people in a wide range of roles, from conservators and curators to marketers and merchandisers. We also recruit around 350 summer staff each year to help our front-of-house teams create a memorable experience for millions of visitors from all over the world. With Royal Collection Trust, you will be trained, supported and inspired to achieve the highest standards. Collaboration is at the heart of what we do, and whatever your role, you will play a key part in ensuring that the Royal Collection and Palaces are valued and enjoyed by everyone.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 414
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marine-discovery-center-inc.jpeg
MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-collection-trust.jpeg
Royal Collection Trust
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Royal Collection Trust
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Collection Trust in 2026.

Incident History — MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Royal Collection Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Collection Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marine-discovery-center-inc.jpeg
MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-collection-trust.jpeg
Royal Collection Trust
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Royal Collection Trust company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Royal Collection Trust company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER company.

In the current year, Royal Collection Trust company and MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Royal Collection Trust company nor MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Royal Collection Trust company nor MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Royal Collection Trust company nor MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER company nor Royal Collection Trust company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER nor Royal Collection Trust holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER company nor Royal Collection Trust company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Royal Collection Trust company employs more people globally than MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER nor Royal Collection Trust holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER nor Royal Collection Trust holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER nor Royal Collection Trust holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER nor Royal Collection Trust holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER nor Royal Collection Trust holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER nor Royal Collection Trust holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References