Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Maribyrnong City CouncilMaribyrnong City Council
VS
County of Santa ClaraCounty of Santa Clara
Maribyrnong City Council

Maribyrnong City Council

Corner Hyde and Napier Streets, Footscray, VIC, 3011, AU

Last Update: 03/03/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

Maribyrnong City Council is undergoing significant change in population growth, redevelopment, and a transitioning economy is leading to an influx of new residents, businesses and opportunities. Maribyrnong is becoming a sought after residential area and a destination ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:484
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
County of Santa Clara

County of Santa Clara

70 W. Hedding St., San Jose, 95110, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sccgov.org
774/1000Fair

The County of Santa Clara is located at the southern end of the San Francisco Bay and encompasses 1,312 square miles. It has one of the highest median family incomes in the country, and a wide diversity of cultures, backgrounds and talents. The County of Santa Clara c...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:13,214
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Maribyrnong City Council

Maribyrnong City Council

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
County of Santa Clara

County of Santa Clara

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maribyrnong City Council in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for County of Santa Clara in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Maribyrnong City Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maribyrnong City Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - County of Santa Clara (X = Date, Y = Severity)

County of Santa Clara cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Maribyrnong City Council

Maribyrnong City Council

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
County of Santa Clara

County of Santa Clara

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
COU1006080425

FAQ

Between Maribyrnong City Council company and County of Santa Clara company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council company and County of Santa Clara company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council company and County of Santa Clara company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council company and County of Santa Clara company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council company and County of Santa Clara company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council company and County of Santa Clara company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council company and County of Santa Clara company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council company and County of Santa Clara company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council company and County of Santa Clara company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council company and County of Santa Clara company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council company and County of Santa Clara company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council and County of Santa Clara, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council and County of Santa Clara, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Maribyrnong City Council or County of Santa Clara ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Maribyrnong City Council or County of Santa Clara ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council and County of Santa Clara, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Maribyrnong City Council and County of Santa Clara, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2