Comparison Overview
Marelli
Marelli
2 Chome-1917 Nisshincho, Kita Ward, Saitama City, 331-0823, JP
Last Update: 15/09/2026
Marelli is a global, independent technology partner to the automotive industry, with a strong and established track record in innovation and manufacturing excellence. As mobility is evolving fast and global trends drive unprecedented innovation, we leverage our expertis...
Maruti Suzuki India Limited
Vasant Kunj,, New Delhi, 110070, IN
Last Update: 06/10/2026
Maruti Suzuki was established with a dream to provide the 'Joy of Mobility' in the early 1980s. With a humble start of manufacturing about 20,000 cars in a year, the Company has grown leaps and bounds, manufacturing close to 2 million cars a year in FY 2022-23. Over the...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Marelli
Maruti Suzuki India Limited
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Marelli in 2026.
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Maruti Suzuki India Limited in 2026.
Incident History - Marelli (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Marelli cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Maruti Suzuki India Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Maruti Suzuki India Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Marelli
Maruti Suzuki India Limited
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.