Comparison Overview
Marcus & Millichap

Marcus & Millichap
23975 Park Sorrento, Calabasas, 91302, US
Last Update: 04/05/2026
Marcus & Millichap was founded in 1971 with the goal of being a new kind of company – one driven by long-term relationships and built on a culture of collaboration. We focus on bringing together specialized market knowledge, the industry's leading brokerage platform and...

CoStar Group
1201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, Virginia, US, 22209
Last Update: 15/09/2026
CoStar Group (NASDAQ: CSGP) is a global leader in commercial real estate information, analytics, online marketplaces, and 3D digital twin technology. Founded in 1986, CoStar Group is dedicated to digitizing the world’s real estate, empowering all people to discover prop...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Marcus & Millichap







CoStar Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
Marcus & Millichap has 43.5% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CoStar Group in 2026.
Incident History - Marcus & Millichap (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Marcus & Millichap cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - CoStar Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CoStar Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Marcus & Millichap

CoStar Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.