Comparison Overview
Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd

Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd
153 Keys road, Moorabbin, 3189, AU
Last Update: 23/02/2026
Marand engineers, manufactures and sustains complex innovative equipment and products for the aerospace, defence, mining, food, rail and energy industries with its customer base predominately blue chip companies such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, BAE Systems, BHP & Rio Ti...

Tata Technologies
25 Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjawadi, Pune, 411057, IN
Last Update: 14/09/2026
We're a global product engineering and digital services company focused on fulfilling our mission of helping the world drive, fly, build, and farm by enabling our customers to realize better products and deliver better experiences. We’re the strategic engineering partne...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd







Tata Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Technologies in 2026.
Incident History - Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tata Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd

Tata Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.