Comparison Overview
Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd

Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd
153 Keys road, Moorabbin, 3189, AU
Last Update: 23/02/2026
Marand engineers, manufactures and sustains complex innovative equipment and products for the aerospace, defence, mining, food, rail and energy industries with its customer base predominately blue chip companies such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, BAE Systems, BHP & Rio Ti...

ALTEN
221 bis boulevard Jean jaurès, Boulogne-Billancourt Cedex, Ile-de-France, FR, 92514
Last Update: 14/09/2026
𝐀 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐈𝐓 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬 ALTEN is committed to meeting the expectations of its stakeholders and anticipating their requirements in the fields of innovation, R&D, and technological information systems. Founded...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd







ALTEN






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ALTEN in 2026.
Incident History - Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ALTEN (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ALTEN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Marand Precision Engineering Pty Ltd

ALTEN
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.