Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Maqta Technologies GroupMaqta Technologies Group
VS
SAPSAP
Maqta Technologies Group

Maqta Technologies Group

N/A

Last Update: 03/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.maqta.com
751/1000Fair

Leading technology group, paving the next era of trade with exponential technologies and unmatched sector expertise.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:48
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SAP

SAP

Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16, Walldorf, 69190, DE

Last Update: 28/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.sap.com
728/1000Moderate

SAP is the leading enterprise application and business AI company. We stand at the intersection of business and technology, where our innovations are designed to directly address real business challenges and produce real-world impacts. Our solutions are the backbone fo...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:138,981
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Maqta Technologies Group

Maqta Technologies Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SAP

SAP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maqta Technologies Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

SAP has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Maqta Technologies Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maqta Technologies Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Maqta Technologies Group

Maqta Technologies Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SAP

SAP

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SAP1780352800
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CHESAPSEC1777508710
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SAPJAG1773959105

FAQ

Between Maqta Technologies Group company and SAP company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group company and SAP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group company and SAP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group company and SAP company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group company and SAP company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group company and SAP company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group company and SAP company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group company and SAP company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group company and SAP company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group company and SAP company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group company and SAP company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group and SAP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group and SAP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Maqta Technologies Group or SAP ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Maqta Technologies Group or SAP ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group and SAP, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Maqta Technologies Group and SAP, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA