Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Maple Leaf Foods IncMaple Leaf Foods Inc
VS
Bimbo Bakeries USABimbo Bakeries USA
Maple Leaf Foods Inc

Maple Leaf Foods Inc

6897 Financial Drive, Mississauga, ON, CA, L5N 0A8

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
721/1000Moderate

Maple Leaf Foods is Canada’s leading consumer-packaged protein company, headquartered in Mississauga, Ontario. We make high-quality, great tasting, nutritious and innovative food products under leading brands including Maple Leaf®, Schneiders®, Mina®, Greenfield Natur...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:6,076
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Bimbo Bakeries USA

Bimbo Bakeries USA

355 Business Center Dr, Horsham, 19044, US

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
696/1000Weak

Have you ever started your morning with a Thomas’® English muffin or bagel? Or bitten into the perfect slice of Sara Lee® bread? Do you break open a fresh box of Entenmann’s® donuts at family gatherings? If so, you’re already a fan of Bimbo Bakeries USA – the powerhouse...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:11,889
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Maple Leaf Foods Inc

Maple Leaf Foods Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bimbo Bakeries USA

Bimbo Bakeries USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maple Leaf Foods Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Bimbo Bakeries USA has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Maple Leaf Foods Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maple Leaf Foods Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bimbo Bakeries USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bimbo Bakeries USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Maple Leaf Foods Inc

Maple Leaf Foods Inc

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MAP224451222
Bimbo Bakeries USA

Bimbo Bakeries USA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ORABIM1789187242
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
WASORABIM1788805468
🔒 Incident : Breach
BIM709080525

FAQ

Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc company and Bimbo Bakeries USA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc and Bimbo Bakeries USA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc and Bimbo Bakeries USA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Maple Leaf Foods Inc or Bimbo Bakeries USA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Maple Leaf Foods Inc or Bimbo Bakeries USA ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc and Bimbo Bakeries USA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Maple Leaf Foods Inc and Bimbo Bakeries USA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA