Comparison Overview
MAPFRE Global Risks

MAPFRE Global Risks
Carr. de Pozuelo, 52 Majadahonda, Madrid, Majadahonda, 28221, ES
Last Update: 26/02/2026
In MAPFRE Global Risks we offer insurance solutions for large companies and have a wide experience derived from leading international programmes through our service network that operates in over 100 countries worldwide. Our position in the Spanish market and prominenc...

AXA XL
One Bermudiana Road, Hamilton, Bermuda, BM, HM08
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We are a leading provider of insurance and reinsurance offering innovative risk management solutions for businesses worldwide. We partner with those who move the world forward, navigating complex risks and working across diverse industries to support and empower our cli...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

MAPFRE Global Risks







AXA XL






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MAPFRE Global Risks in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AXA XL in 2026.
Incident History - MAPFRE Global Risks (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MAPFRE Global Risks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AXA XL (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AXA XL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

MAPFRE Global Risks

AXA XL
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.