Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Manter by Fedrigoni Self-AdhesivesManter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives
VS
Avery DennisonAvery Dennison
Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives

Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives

Via Senatore Simonetta, 24, None, Caponago , Italy, IT, 20867

Last Update: 29/04/2026

View Profile
742/1000Moderate

We want to get you inspired! Part of Fedrigoni Group since 1993, the Manter brand produces beautiful self-adhesive prime papers for the labelling sector, providing a comprehensive range of materials for designers looking for the best for their creations.

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:91
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

Mentor, Ohio, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://averydennison.com
776/1000Fair

We are a global materials science and digital identification solutions company with locations in over 50 countries, and approximately 35,000 employees worldwide. We are Making Possible™ products and solutions that provide branding and information solutions that optimiz...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:21,695
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives

Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avery Dennison in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Avery Dennison (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avery Dennison cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives

Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives company and Avery Dennison company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives company and Avery Dennison company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives and Avery Dennison, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives and Avery Dennison, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives or Avery Dennison ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives or Avery Dennison ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives and Avery Dennison, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Manter by Fedrigoni Self-Adhesives and Avery Dennison, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA