Comparison Overview
Manserv

Manserv
Rua Nazaret 369, São Caetano do Sul, BR
Last Update: 03/04/2026
A Manserv tem no ato de servir sua principal vocação. A organização, fundada em 1985, tem estrutura empresarial sólida e abrangente. Especializada nas áreas de Manutenção, Facilities, Logística e Tecnologia, possui extenso portfólio de produtos e serviços, capazes d...

Alorica
5161 California Ave, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, US, 92617
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We’re passionate about creating customers for life by designing experiences that elevate your brand. As your full-service CX partner from strategy to execution, we blend proven performance, industry-leading expertise and the right technology that delivers real results a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Manserv







Alorica






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Manserv in 2026.
Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Alorica in 2026.
Incident History - Manserv (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Manserv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Alorica (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Alorica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Manserv

Alorica
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.