Comparison Overview
Manpower Deutschland

Manpower Deutschland
Große Gallusstraße 1-7, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen 60311, DE
Last Update: 13/04/2026
Als einer der größten Personaldienstleister in Deutschland vermittelt Manpower seit 1965 gewerbliches Personal und qualifizierte Fachkräfte in passende Arbeitsplätze. Mit einem weit verzweigten Netzwerk an Kunden in der Industrie, Gewerbebetrieben, Technik und Handwerk ...

Manpower
100 Manpower Place, Milwaukee, WI, US, 53212
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Manpower is the global leader in contingent and permanent recruitment workforce solutions. We provide the agility businesses need with a continuum of staffing solutions. By leveraging our trusted brands, we have built a deeper talent pool to provide our clients access t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Manpower Deutschland







Manpower






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Manpower Deutschland in 2026.
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Manpower in 2026.
Incident History - Manpower Deutschland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Manpower Deutschland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Manpower (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Manpower cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Manpower Deutschland

Manpower
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.