Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera BreadManna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread
VS
Taco BellTaco Bell
Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread

Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread

2339 11th St, Encinitas, 92024, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
690/1000Weak

Founded in 2003, under the leadership of Paul Saber, President & CEO, and Patrick Rogers, Operating Partner, Manna Development Group has grown to become one of Panera Bread’s largest franchisees. Committed to operating great restaurants, a heart of service, and a desire...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:196
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Taco Bell

Taco Bell

1 Glen Bell Way, Irvine, CA, US, 92618

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://tacobell.com
753/1000Fair

Taco Bell was born and raised in California and has been around since 1962. We went from selling everyone’s favorite Crunchy Tacos on the West Coast to a global brand with 8,200+ restaurants, 350 franchise organizations, that serve 42+ million fans each week around the ...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:83,616
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread

Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Taco Bell

Taco Bell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taco Bell in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Taco Bell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taco Bell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread

Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAN1332213111125
Taco Bell

Taco Bell

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NORKFCFOHTACHYA1769001351

FAQ

Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread company and Taco Bell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread company and Taco Bell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread company and Taco Bell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread company and Taco Bell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread company and Taco Bell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread and Taco Bell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread and Taco Bell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread or Taco Bell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread or Taco Bell ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread and Taco Bell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Manna Development Group LLC, Franchisee of Panera Bread and Taco Bell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89322
SUMMARY

Vault and Vault Enterprise did not consistently evaluate ACL policies against the canonical form of resource and policy names. This may allow an authenticated user with delegated permissions to bypass an explicit deny restriction and access a protected resource or assign a denied policy, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-89322) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.1.2, and Vault Enterprise 2.1.2, 1.21.12, 1.20.17, and 1.19.23.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-107314
SUMMARY

pgjdbc, the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, versions 42.7.11 through 42.7.13 enforce no restriction when the requireAuth connection property excludes all six authentication methods the driver knows, for example requireAuth=!password,!md5,!gss,!sspi,!scram-sha-256,!none. The driver then accepts any method the server asks for, including cleartext password authentication. A value without a method in it, such as requireAuth=, (a single comma), is affected the same way. An attacker positioned between the application and its server can ask for cleartext password authentication and receive the database password. A positive list such as requireAuth=scram-sha-256, and a partial exclusion such as requireAuth=!password,!md5, are enforced correctly. The property has no default value, so a deployment that does not set it is not affected. 42.7.14 fixes the problem: such a connection is refused with SQLState 08004, and a value without a method in it is rejected as invalid.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107285
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, a proxied ws request is carried through CONNECT, but NettyRequestFactory.newNettyRequest and requestUri decide whether to attach proxy authentication and an absolute-form target only from whether the URI is secure. Because ws is not marked secure, the tunneled WebSocket upgrade sent to the origin includes the proxy's Proxy-Authorization value. Basic credentials are directly recoverable and Digest responses can be replayed or cracked offline. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107284
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, WebSocketHandler.upgrade aborts a handshake whose Sec-WebSocket-Accept value is missing or invalid but continues into pipeline installation and onOpen delivery. Frames coalesced with the invalid 101 response can be decoded and delivered from a peer that did not prove the handshake, although the request future fails and the channel closes. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107283
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, Realm.Builder generates the HTTP Digest client nonce with ThreadLocalRandom rather than a cryptographically secure random source. Digest relies on an unpredictable cnonce to resist chosen-plaintext and credential precomputation attacks, so an observer able to infer generator state can reduce the protection of the authentication exchange. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2