Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Manheim by Cox AutomotiveManheim by Cox Automotive
VS
Magna InternationalMagna International
Manheim by Cox Automotive

Manheim by Cox Automotive

6205 Peachtree Dunwoody Rd, Atlanta, 30328, US

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.manheim.com
760/1000Fair

For great career opportunities, visit www.manheim.jobs. Manheim was established in 1945 as a wholesale vehicle auction operation. With 20,000 employees in 106 operating locations around the globe, Manheim is the world’s leading provider of vehicle remarketing servic...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:5,460
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Magna International

Magna International

377 Magna Drive, Aurora, Ontario, CA, L4G 7K1

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.magna.com
785/1000Fair

We see a future where everyone can live and move without limitations. That’s why we are developing technologies, systems and concepts that make vehicles safer and cleaner, while serving our communities, the planet and, above all, people. Forward. For all. Our common s...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:41,612
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Manheim by Cox Automotive

Manheim by Cox Automotive

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Magna International

Magna International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Manheim by Cox Automotive in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Magna International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Manheim by Cox Automotive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Manheim by Cox Automotive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Magna International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Magna International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Manheim by Cox Automotive

Manheim by Cox Automotive

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Magna International

Magna International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Manheim by Cox Automotive company and Magna International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive company and Magna International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive company and Magna International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive company and Magna International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive company and Magna International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive company and Magna International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive company and Magna International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive and Magna International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive and Magna International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Manheim by Cox Automotive or Magna International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Manheim by Cox Automotive or Magna International ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive and Magna International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Manheim by Cox Automotive and Magna International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA