Comparison Overview
MANGO

MANGO
Mercaders 9-11, Palau Solità i Plegamans, 08184, ES
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Mango, one of the leading international fashion groups, is a global company with design and creativity at the heart of its business model and a strategy based on constant innovation, the pursuit of sustainability and a complete ecosystem of channels and partners. With ...

Tailored Brands, Inc.
6380 Rogerdale Rd, Houston, 77072, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Our Purpose: We help people love the way they look and feel for their most important moments. Our Values: • Customer-First - We put customers at the center of every decision • Win Together - We rally together to achieve common goals • Better Every Day - We strive for e...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

MANGO







Tailored Brands, Inc.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
MANGO has 66.67% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tailored Brands, Inc. in 2026.
Incident History - MANGO (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MANGO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tailored Brands, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tailored Brands, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

MANGO

Tailored Brands, Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.