Comparison Overview

MANGO

VS

Ralph Lauren

MANGO

Mercaders 9-11, Poligono Industrial Riera de Caldes, Palau Solità i Plegamans, Barcelona, ES, 08184
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://jobs.mango.com/

Mango, one of the leading international fashion groups, is a global company with design and creativity at the heart of its business model and a strategy based on constant innovation, the pursuit of sustainability and a complete ecosystem of channels and partners. With its roots in Barcelona, one of the cradles of the textile industry, since it was founded in 1984, Mango has spent four decades looking to the future and inspiring the world with its passion for fashion and lifestyle. With the customer always its priority, the company bases its model on a unique fashion proposal focused on translating key fashion trends into its own language. At the Campus Mango, located at the company headquarters (Palau-solità i Plegamans, Barcelona), the company works on all areas related to creativity and every year creates over 18,000 garments and accessories. Present in more than 120 markets and with a network of close to 2,850 points of sales, Mango adapts to each country with a complete ecosystem of channels and international partners. The company closed 2024 with a turnover of 3.3 billion euros, with 32% of turnover coming from its online channel and with a workforce of more than 16,400 employees in all five continents. More information at www.mangofashiongroup.com

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 11,444
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Ralph Lauren

650 Madison Ave, New York, US
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 800 and 849
http://corporate.ralphlauren.com

Ralph Lauren Corporation (NYSE:RL) is a global leader in the design, marketing and distribution of luxury lifestyle products in five categories: apparel, footwear & accessories, home, fragrances and hospitality. For more than 50 years, Ralph Lauren has sought to inspire the dream of a better life through authenticity and timeless style. Its reputation and distinctive image have been developed across a wide range of products, brands, distribution channels and international markets. The Company’s brand names – which include Ralph Lauren, Ralph Lauren Collection, Ralph Lauren Purple Label, Polo Ralph Lauren, Double RL, Lauren Ralph Lauren, Polo Ralph Lauren Children and Chaps, among others – constitute one of the world’s most widely recognized families of consumer brands.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 21,075
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mango.jpeg
MANGO
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ralph-lauren.jpeg
Ralph Lauren
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MANGO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ralph Lauren
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

MANGO has 16.28% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ralph Lauren in 2025.

Incident History — MANGO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MANGO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ralph Lauren (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ralph Lauren cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mango.jpeg
MANGO
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: third-party vendor compromise, supply chain attack
Motivation: data theft, extortion, financial gain (potential ransom)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ralph-lauren.jpeg
Ralph Lauren
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ralph Lauren company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MANGO company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

MANGO company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ralph Lauren company has not reported any.

In the current year, MANGO company has reported more cyber incidents than Ralph Lauren company.

Neither Ralph Lauren company nor MANGO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

MANGO company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Ralph Lauren company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ralph Lauren company nor MANGO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MANGO company nor Ralph Lauren company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MANGO nor Ralph Lauren holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MANGO company nor Ralph Lauren company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ralph Lauren company employs more people globally than MANGO company, reflecting its scale as a Retail Apparel and Fashion.

Neither MANGO nor Ralph Lauren holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MANGO nor Ralph Lauren holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MANGO nor Ralph Lauren holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MANGO nor Ralph Lauren holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MANGO nor Ralph Lauren holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MANGO nor Ralph Lauren holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Framework prior to versions 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x display the full server stack trace when encountering an error within the GetCdfResource servlet.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Editor plugin versions before 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x, deserialize untrusted JSON data without constraining the parser to approved classes and methods.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The impacted element is an unknown function in the library /ctcms/libs/Ct_Config.php of the component Backend System Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument Cj_Add/Cj_Edit results in code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The affected element is the function Save of the file /ctcms/libs/Ct_App.php of the component Backend App Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument CT_App_Paytype leads to code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15, it was possible to accept an invitation opened by a different user. Version 5.15. contains a patch. As a workaround, avoid leaving one's Weblate sessions with an invitation opened unattended.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References