Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mandiant (part of Google Cloud)Mandiant (part of Google Cloud)
VS
Palo Alto NetworksPalo Alto Networks
Mandiant (part of Google Cloud)

Mandiant (part of Google Cloud)

1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, California, US, 94043

Last Update: 29/06/2026

View Profile
459/1000Critical

We’re determined to make organizations secure against cyber threats and confident in their readiness. Experience the same trusted cybersecurity solutions, now from Google Cloud.

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:1,456
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks

3000 Tannery Way, SANTA CLARA, 95054, US

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
584/1000Very Poor

Palo Alto Networks, the global cybersecurity leader, is shaping the cloud-centric future with technology that is transforming the way people and organizations operate. Our mission is to be the cybersecurity partner of choice, protecting our digital way of life. We help ...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:22,839
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
13
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mandiant (part of Google Cloud)

Mandiant (part of Google Cloud)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) has 194.12% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

Palo Alto Networks has 1162.14% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Palo Alto Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palo Alto Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mandiant (part of Google Cloud)

Mandiant (part of Google Cloud)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MAN1781879096
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MAN1779107075
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MAN1776716698
Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FORCHEMIKPALMICODIADOITR1789359970
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CHEFORPALCIT1784881580
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
PAL1780115030

FAQ

Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) and Palo Alto Networks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) and Palo Alto Networks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) or Palo Alto Networks ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) or Palo Alto Networks ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) and Palo Alto Networks, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mandiant (part of Google Cloud) and Palo Alto Networks, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94057
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94056
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94055
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94054
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-93993
SUMMARY

Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8