Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ManageEngineManageEngine
VS
Baidu, Inc.Baidu, Inc.
ManageEngine

ManageEngine

4708 Highway 71 E, Del Valle, 78617, US

Last Update: 25/06/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.manageengine.com
637/1000Poor

ManageEngine crafts the industry's broadest suite of IT management software. We have everything you need—more than 60+ enterprise products and 60+ free tools—to manage all of your IT operations, from networks and servers to applications, service desk, Active Directory, ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:587
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3
Baidu, Inc.

Baidu, Inc.

Baidu Campus,, Beijing, 100085, CN

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
806/1000Good

Baidu is a leading AI company with strong Internet foundation, driven by our mission to “make the complicated world simpler through technology”. Founded in 2000 as a search engine platform, we were an early adopter of artificial intelligence in 2010. Since then, we hav...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:26,552
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ManageEngine

ManageEngine

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Baidu, Inc.

Baidu, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

ManageEngine has 88.68% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baidu, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ManageEngine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ManageEngine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Baidu, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baidu, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ManageEngine

ManageEngine

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MANWHA1782174233
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MANMAN1782397883
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MAN305080925
Baidu, Inc.

Baidu, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ManageEngine company and Baidu, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ManageEngine company and Baidu, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ManageEngine company and Baidu, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ManageEngine company and Baidu, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ManageEngine company and Baidu, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ManageEngine company and Baidu, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ManageEngine company and Baidu, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ManageEngine company and Baidu, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ManageEngine company and Baidu, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ManageEngine company and Baidu, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ManageEngine company and Baidu, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ManageEngine and Baidu, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ManageEngine and Baidu, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ManageEngine or Baidu, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ManageEngine or Baidu, Inc. ?
Between ManageEngine and Baidu, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ManageEngine and Baidu, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9