Comparison Overview
Makro South Africa

Makro South Africa
16 Peltier Drive, Johannesburg, 2157, ZA
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Makro operates 22 massive warehouse stores situated in the large metropolitan centres in South Africa selling food, liquor and general merchandise to retail and wholesale customers. Makro has evolved in the retail space from a stalwart warehouse chain to now being able ...

Reliance Retail
Reliance Corporate Park, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
Last Update: 05/04/2026
Reliance Retail is the retail initiative of RIL and an epicentre of our consumer-facing businesses. It has been ranked as the fastest-growing retailer in the world. It is ranked 53rd in the list of Top Global Retailers and is the only Indian Retailer to feature in the T...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Makro South Africa







Reliance Retail






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Makro South Africa in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Reliance Retail in 2026.
Incident History - Makro South Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Makro South Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Reliance Retail (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Reliance Retail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Makro South Africa

Reliance Retail
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.