Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kosan CrisplantKosan Crisplant
VS
FLSmidthFLSmidth
Kosan Crisplant

Kosan Crisplant

Alsvej 21, Randers SV, Middle Jutland, 8940, DK

Last Update: 14/05/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

Kosan Crisplant has become MAKEEN Gas Solutions. This page is inactive - if you want to keep following MAKEEN Gas Solutions, please follow our new page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/makeen-energy-gas-solutions/

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:400
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
FLSmidth

FLSmidth

Vigerslev Allé 77, Copenhagen, Valby, DK, DK-2500

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fls.com
760/1000Fair

FLSmidth is a full flowsheet technology and service supplier to the global mining industry. We enable our customers to improve performance, lower operating costs and reduce environmental impact. MissionZero is our sustainability ambition towards zero emissions in mining...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:13,187
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kosan Crisplant

Kosan Crisplant

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
FLSmidth

FLSmidth

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kosan Crisplant in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FLSmidth in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kosan Crisplant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kosan Crisplant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - FLSmidth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FLSmidth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kosan Crisplant

Kosan Crisplant

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
FLSmidth

FLSmidth

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kosan Crisplant company and FLSmidth company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kosan Crisplant company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kosan Crisplant company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kosan Crisplant company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kosan Crisplant company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kosan Crisplant company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kosan Crisplant company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kosan Crisplant company and FLSmidth company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kosan Crisplant company and FLSmidth company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kosan Crisplant company and FLSmidth company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kosan Crisplant company and FLSmidth company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kosan Crisplant and FLSmidth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kosan Crisplant and FLSmidth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kosan Crisplant or FLSmidth ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kosan Crisplant or FLSmidth ?
Between Kosan Crisplant and FLSmidth, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kosan Crisplant and FLSmidth, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9