Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Makedonski Telekom ADMakedonski Telekom AD
VS
NokiaNokia
Makedonski Telekom AD

Makedonski Telekom AD

Kej 13-ti Noemvri br.6, Skopje, 1000, MK

Last Update: 12/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.telekom.mk
757/1000Fair

Makedonski Telekom is a leading national telecommunications operator that has been part of the Deutsche Telekom Group since 2001. The company provides the following services for private and business customers: voice and data services via mobile and fixed network, Intern...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:809
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nokia

Nokia

Karakaari 7, Espoo, Southern Finland, FI, 02610

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.nokia.com
802/1000Good

Nokia is a global leader in connectivity for the AI era. With expertise across fixed, mobile, and transport networks, powered by the innovation of Nokia Bell Labs, we’re advancing connectivity to secure a brighter world. Advanced connectivity is key to enable the oppor...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:100,250
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Makedonski Telekom AD

Makedonski Telekom AD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nokia

Nokia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Makedonski Telekom AD in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nokia in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Makedonski Telekom AD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Makedonski Telekom AD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nokia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nokia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Makedonski Telekom AD

Makedonski Telekom AD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nokia

Nokia

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NOK000031025

FAQ

Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and Nokia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and Nokia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and Nokia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and Nokia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and Nokia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and Nokia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and Nokia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and Nokia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and Nokia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and Nokia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and Nokia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD and Nokia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD and Nokia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Makedonski Telekom AD or Nokia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Makedonski Telekom AD or Nokia ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD and Nokia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD and Nokia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA