Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Makedonski Telekom ADMakedonski Telekom AD
VS
airtelairtel
Makedonski Telekom AD

Makedonski Telekom AD

Kej 13-ti Noemvri br.6, Skopje, 1000, MK

Last Update: 12/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.telekom.mk
757/1000Fair

Makedonski Telekom is a leading national telecommunications operator that has been part of the Deutsche Telekom Group since 2001. The company provides the following services for private and business customers: voice and data services via mobile and fixed network, Intern...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:809
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
airtel

airtel

Plot 16, Udyog Vihar Phase IV, Gurgaon, Haryana, IN, 122009

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://careers.airtel.com/
818/1000Good

Airtel was founded to provide global connectivity and unlock endless opportunities. Our organization embodies a unique blend of energy, innovation, creativity, dedication, scale, and ownership, all aimed at being limitless. At Airtel, we strive to go beyond our duties t...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:104,048
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Makedonski Telekom AD

Makedonski Telekom AD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
airtel

airtel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Makedonski Telekom AD in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for airtel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Makedonski Telekom AD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Makedonski Telekom AD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - airtel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

airtel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Makedonski Telekom AD

Makedonski Telekom AD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
airtel

airtel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AIR038523

FAQ

Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and airtel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and airtel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and airtel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and airtel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and airtel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and airtel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and airtel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and airtel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and airtel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and airtel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD company and airtel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD and airtel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD and airtel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Makedonski Telekom AD or airtel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Makedonski Telekom AD or airtel ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD and airtel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Makedonski Telekom AD and airtel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1