Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance GroupMAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group
VS
AssurantAssurant
MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group

MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group

11 Oktomvri 25, Skopje, 1000, MK

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.insumak.mk/
751/1000Fair

Сите видови неживотно осигурување и реосигурување. Осигурување имот, моторни возила, лица од незгода, осигурување од одговорност, патничко осигурување. Нашата компанија е стабилна потпора на големите економски субјекти од индустријата, како и на малите и средни деловни ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:48
Subsidiaries:59
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Assurant

Assurant

260 Interstate North Circle SE, Atlanta, 30339, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.assurant.com
781/1000Fair

Assurant is a leading global business services company that supports, protects, and connects major consumer purchases. A Fortune 500 company with a presence in 21 countries, Assurant supports the advancement of the connected world by partnering with the world’s leading ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:16,250
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group

MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Assurant

Assurant

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Assurant in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Assurant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Assurant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group

MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Assurant

Assurant

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group company and Assurant company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group company and Assurant company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group company and Assurant company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group company and Assurant company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group company and Assurant company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group company and Assurant company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group company and Assurant company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group company and Assurant company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group company and Assurant company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group company and Assurant company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group company and Assurant company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group and Assurant, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group and Assurant, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group or Assurant ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group or Assurant ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group and Assurant, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MAKEDONIJA osiguruvanje AD Skopje - Vienna Insurance Group and Assurant, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2