Comparison Overview
Makati Development Corporation
Makati Development Corporation
1F Bonifacio Technology Center, 31st cor 2nd Ave.,, Taguig, undefined, 1634, PH
Last Update: 12/12/2025
MAKATI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ayala Land, Inc., the leading real estate development company in the Philippines. In 1950, MDC was the construction division of Ayala Corporation, the company that developed Makati into a premier financia...
GMR Group
New Udaan Bhawan, New Delhi, 110037, IN
Last Update: 07/10/2026
GMR Group is a leading Indian infrastructure conglomerate with a diversified presence across Airports, Energy, Transportation, Urban Infrastructure, and Sports. With over two decades of experience, the Group has built world-class assets and pioneered innovations in sust...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Makati Development Corporation
GMR Group
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Makati Development Corporation in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GMR Group in 2026.
Incident History - Makati Development Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Makati Development Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - GMR Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GMR Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Makati Development Corporation
GMR Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.