Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset ManagementMajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management
VS
GoTo GroupGoTo Group
MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management

MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management

N/A

Last Update: 02/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.majortom.net
755/1000Fair

Better manage the brand assets your organization relies on by granting online access to approved images, photographs, logos, documents, and videos, wherever and whenever they are needed.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GoTo Group

GoTo Group

Jakarta, ID

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gotocompany.com/
796/1000Fair

GoTo is the largest technology group in Indonesia, combining on-demand and financial services through the Gojek and GoTo Financial brands. It is the first platform in Southeast Asia to host these two essential use cases in one ecosystem, capturing a majority of Indonesi...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:17,269
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management

MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GoTo Group

GoTo Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GoTo Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GoTo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GoTo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management

MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GoTo Group

GoTo Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management company and GoTo Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management company and GoTo Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management company and GoTo Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management company and GoTo Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management company and GoTo Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management company and GoTo Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management company and GoTo Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management company and GoTo Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management company and GoTo Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management company and GoTo Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management company and GoTo Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management and GoTo Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management and GoTo Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management or GoTo Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management or GoTo Group ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management and GoTo Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MajorTom - Complete Digital Asset Management and GoTo Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9