Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LYOVELLYOVEL
VS
WonderWonder
LYOVEL

LYOVEL

6, Avenue Réaumur, Clamart, Île-de-France 92140, FR

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

LYOVEL est un des leaders de la distribution automatique en France avec un chiffre d'affaire de 60 millions d'Euros et 500 employés. Nous accompagnons nos clients afin de mettre en œuvre les solutions d'espace pause les plus adaptées à leurs besoins (boissons chaudes, b...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Wonder

Wonder

150 Greenwich St, New York, 10007, US

Last Update: 16/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wonder.com
771/1000Fair

Wonder is the mealtime platform built to satisfy every craving without compromise. With options including dine-in, delivery, pickup, and meal kits, Wonder makes every dining experience effortless. With the Wonder app, you can combine hundreds of dishes from the menus of...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,032
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LYOVEL

LYOVEL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wonder

Wonder

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food & Beverages Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LYOVEL in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food & Beverages Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wonder in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LYOVEL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LYOVEL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wonder (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wonder cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LYOVEL

LYOVEL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Wonder

Wonder

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LYOVEL company and Wonder company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LYOVEL company and Wonder company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LYOVEL company and Wonder company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LYOVEL company and Wonder company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LYOVEL company and Wonder company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LYOVEL company and Wonder company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LYOVEL company and Wonder company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LYOVEL company and Wonder company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LYOVEL company and Wonder company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LYOVEL company and Wonder company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LYOVEL company and Wonder company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LYOVEL and Wonder, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LYOVEL and Wonder, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LYOVEL or Wonder ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LYOVEL or Wonder ?
Between LYOVEL and Wonder, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LYOVEL and Wonder, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2